Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15059992›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Patterns of insertions and their covariation with substitutions in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.

Shan Yang, Arian F Smit, Scott Schwartz, Francesca Chiaromonte, Krishna M Roskin, David Haussler, Webb Miller, Ross C Hardison

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Amphetamine Exerts Dose-Dependent Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Attractor Dynamics during Working Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A transgenic Alzheimer rat with plaques, tau pathology, behavioral impairment, oligomeric aβ, and frank neuronal loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shan YangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Arian F Smit
Scott Schwartz
Francesca Chiaromonte
Krishna M Roskin
David Haussler
Webb Miller
Ross C Hardison
Pennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USInstitute for Systems Biology · US

Funding

UCSC Center for Genomic Science, and Minority Outreach ProgramP41HG002371 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI HAUSSLER, DAVID H · 2001 to 2011
$34.8M
Maintenance and Development of RepeatMasker and RepeatModelerR01HG002939 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI Robert MacDonald Hubley, Arian Fredericus Anthonius Smit · 2003 to 2026
$9.1M
SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING BIOSEQUENCE DATAR01HG002238 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MILLER, WEBB COLBY · 2000 to 2010
$7.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1P41HG02371NHGRI NIH HHS HG02238NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002371NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002238NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rates at which human genomic DNA changes by neutral substitution and insertion of certain families of transposable elements covary in large, megabase-sized segments. We used the rat, mouse, and human genomic DNA sequences to examine these processes in more detail in comparisons over both shorter (rat-mouse) and longer (rodent-primate) times, and demonstrated the generality of the covariation. Different families of transposable elements show distinctive insertion preferences and patterns of variation with substitution rates. SINEs are more abundant in GC-rich DNA, but the regional GC preference for insertion (monitored in young SINEs) differs between rodents and humans. In contrast, insertions in the rodent genomes are predominantly LINEs, which prefer to insert into AT-rich DNA in all three mammals. The insertion frequency of repeats other than SINEs correlates strongly positively with the frequency of substitutions in all species. However, correlations with SINEs show the opposite effects. The correlations are explained only in part by the GC content, indicating that other factors also contribute to the inherent tendency of DNA segments to change over evolutionary time.

Indexed as

GenomeGenome, HumanAnimalsComputational BiologyDNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGC Rich SequenceGenetic VariationHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMiceMutagenesis, InsertionalRatsSequence AlignmentShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsSpecies SpecificityDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID15059992
PMCPMC383295
OpenAlexW2080434054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.