Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15059990›Full record

ArticleGenome research2004

Recent segmental duplications in the working draft assembly of the brown Norway rat.

Eray Tuzun, Jeffrey A Bailey, Evan E Eichler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Developmental social communication deficits in the Shank3 rat model of phelan-mcdermid syndrome and autism spectrum disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bovine NK-lysin: Copy number variation and functional diversification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The evolution of human segmental duplications and the core duplicon hypothesis.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2009
    Review
  18. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2008
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eray TuzunDepartment of Genetics, Center for Computational Genomics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Jeffrey A Bailey
Evan E Eichler

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007250 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, ALEX YEE-CHEN · 1985 to 2023
$33.4M
MECHANISM &INSTABILITY OF PERICENTROMERIC DUPLICATIONSR01GM058815 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EICHLER, EVAN · 1999 to 2010
$2.9M
Process &Outcomes of BRCAL/2 clinical testingR01HG002318 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI GARBER, JUDY ELLEN · 2001 to 2003
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA094816NHGRI NIH HHS HG002318NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002318NIGMS NIH HHS GM58815NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058815NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007250PHS HHS ER62862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the content, structure, and distribution of segmental duplications (> or =90% sequence identity, > or =5 kb length) within the published version of the Rattus norvegicus genome assembly (v.3.1). The overall fraction of duplicated sequence within the rat assembly (2.92%) is greater than that of the mouse (1%-1.2%) but significantly less than that of human ( approximately 5%). Duplications were nonuniformly distributed, occurring predominantly as tandem and tightly clustered intrachromosomal duplications. Regions containing extensive interchromosomal duplications were observed, particularly within subtelomeric and pericentromeric regions. We identified 41 discrete genomic regions greater than 1 Mb in size, termed "duplication blocks." These appear to have been the target of extensive duplication over millions of years of evolution. Gene content within duplicated regions ( approximately 1%) was lower than expected based on the genome representation. Interestingly, sequence contigs lacking chromosome assignment ("the unplaced chromosome") showed a marked enrichment for segmental duplication (45% of 75.2 Mb), indicating that segmental duplications have been problematic for sequence and assembly of the rat genome. Further targeted efforts are required to resolve the organization and complexity of these regions.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationAnimalsBase CompositionChromosomesComputational BiologyContig MappingGene ConversionGenesGenomeRatsRats, Inbred BN

Identifiers

PMID15059990
PMCPMC383293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.