ArticleFolia microbiologica1992
Bacterial infection modulated by glucan: a search for the host defense potentiation mechanisms.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of glucan on murine lupus evolution and on host resistance to Klebsiella pneumoniae.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 1997Article
- Pulmonary inflammation induced by repeated inhalations of beta(1,3)-D-glucan and endotoxin.International journal of experimental pathology · 1994Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interactions between bacteria and the host were studied from day 0 up to day 10 post-challenge in mice pretreated with soluble glucan (20 mg/kg i.p.) and challenged supralaryngeally with a virulent strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. In the initial phase of infection, clearance of bacteria in the airways of glucan-treated mice was improved to an extent comparable with the vaccinated group but, in contrast to the immunized animals, subsequent regrowth of the bacterial inoculum was not prevented. The efficacy of defense, based during the entire course of infection mainly upon phagocytosis by neutrophils, markedly increased at intervals corresponding to the onset of humoral immune response. No evidence was obtained to indicate an enhanced involvement of alveolar macrophages in the phagocytosis of bacteria in glucan-stimulated mice. The results further support the notion that improvement of specific immune responsiveness rather than activation of nonspecific effector functions might be the most important expression of the host-defense-potentiating capacity of glucan and related stimulants of microbial origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.