Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2004
Long-term plasma catecholamines in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy treated with losartan or atenolol: ICARUS, a LIFE substudy.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00338260 (A Triple-Blind, Parallel Study to Investigate the Effect of Losartan Versus Atenolol on the Reduction of Morbidity and Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Triple-Blind, Parallel Study to Investigate the Effect of Losartan Versus Atenolol on the Reduction of Morbidity and Mortality in Hypertensive Patients With Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality. Plasma catecholamines are linked to the pathogenesis of hypertension. Pharmacological intervention, including treatment with beta-blockers, reduces cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study, the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan significantly reduced cardiovascular end points compared to the beta-blocker atenolol. Thus, for the first time, one drug was shown to be superior to another in hypertension. The present substudy examined the effects of atenolol vs losartan treatment on plasma catecholamines at rest and during hyperinsulinaemia in a cohort of 86 LIFE patients. Plasma adrenaline increased significantly from placebo treatment at baseline to year 1 of treatment (P<0.0001), and also during hyperinsulinaemia (P<0.0001). Plasma noradrenaline did not change significantly from placebo treatment at baseline to year 1, but increased significantly during hyperinsulinaemia both at baseline and at year 1 (P<0.0001 for both). There were no differences in plasma catecholamines or the relative changes between the two treatment arms at any stage. In a subset of 42 patients examined also at years 2 and 3, these findings were confirmed during long-term treatment. Thus, losartan had an effect on plasma catecholamines comparable to that with the beta-blocker atenolol in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy at rest and during hyperinsulinaemia. We find it unlikely that a difference in sympathetic activity explains the outcome benefits of losartan over atenolol in the LIFE study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.