ReviewEuropean journal of epidemiology1992
Atherogenic profiles in insulin-dependent diabetic patients and their treatment.
Review in European journal of epidemiology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Long-Term Antibiotic Therapy of Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to EGFR Inhibitors in Colorectal Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Longitudinal studies have shown a large excess of cardiovascular mortality in insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) as compared to non-diabetic controls. Although diabetes appears to be an independent cardiovascular risk factor, increases in total and LDL-cholesterol together with a decrease of HDL-cholesterol are more pronounced in diabetics with cardiovascular disease. The general opinion, however, derived from a large number of cross-sectional studies, is that in well-controlled IDDM lipoprotein abnormalities are modest and only slightly different from matched non-diabetic controls. Most of the studies, however, used absolute criteria based on consensus statements and do not take the internal relations of the lipoproteins into account. When atherogenic indices (such as the relationship between total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol or the Apo A1/apo B quotient) are used, 20 to 30% of an IDDM population considered to be in clinically acceptable control have to be considered pathological. This observation is even more important since the recent Diabetes Control and Complications Trial has shown that, especially in the younger group of patients, significantly higher total cholesterol and triglycerides and lower HDL-cholesterol were observed. Especially in these patients can diet and drug intervention be the most useful in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. These data are consistent with the fact that more sophisticated techniques have previously shown atherogenic changes in the composition of the VLDL-particles and lipoprotein enrichment in apo B. Since these techniques are not easily available in the clinic one has to refer to more classical techniques and the use of above mentioned atherogenic profiles to decide treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.