ArticleIntensive care medicine2004
Glycemic control in the ICU: a multicenter survey.
Article in Intensive care medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tight glycaemic control by an automated algorithm with time-variant sampling in medical ICU patients.Intensive care medicine · 2008Trial
- Analysis of blood glucose measurements using capillary and arterial blood samples in intensive care patients.Intensive care medicine · 2005Trial
- Performance evaluation of three i-SENS glucometers using arterial blood samples compared with the YSI 2300 Glucose Analyzer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Article
- Analytic evaluation of a new glucose meter system in 15 different critical care settings.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2013Article
- Tight perioperative glycemic control using an artificial endocrine pancreas.Surgery today · 2010Review
- Relationship between perioperative glycemic control and postoperative infections.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009Review
- Current status of tight blood sugar control.Current infectious disease reports · 2008Article
- Improvement in glycemic control and outcome corresponding to intensive insulin therapy protocol development.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2008Article
- Failure to achieve glycemic control despite intensive insulin therapy in a medical ICU: incidence and influence on ICU mortality.Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
- Impact of bolus application of low-dose hydrocortisone on glycemic control in septic shock patients.Intensive care medicine · 2007Article
- Intensive insulin therapy in intensive care: an example of the struggle to implement evidence-based medicine.PLoS medicine · 2006Article
- Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2004. II. Brain injury, hemodynamic monitoring and treatment, pulmonary embolism, gastrointestinal tract, and renal failure.Intensive care medicine · 2005Review
- Tight blood glucose control: a recommendation applicable to any critically ill patient?Critical care (London, England) · 2004Article
- Inpatient management of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive insulin therapy has recently been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality in the critically ill population in a large randomized clinical trial.
objectiveTo determine the beliefs and attitudes of ICU clinicians about glycemic control.
designSelf-administered survey.
participantsICU nurses and physicians in five university-affiliated multidisciplinary ICUs.
resultsA total of 317 questionnaires were returned from 233 ICU nurses and 84 physicians. The reported clinically important threshold for hypoglycemia was 4 mmol/l (median, IQR 3-4 mmol/l). In non-diabetic patients, the clinically important threshold for hyperglycemia was 10 mmol/l (IQR 9-12 mmol/l); however, nurses had a significantly higher threshold than physicians (difference of 0.52 mmol/l (95% CI 0.09-0.94 mmol/l, P=0.018). In diabetic patients, the clinically important threshold for hyperglycemia was also 10 mmol/l (IQR 10-12 mmol/l), and again nurses had a significantly higher threshold than physicians (0.81 mmol/l, 95% CI 0.29-1.32 mmol/l, P=0.0023). Avoidance of hyperglycemia was judged most important for diabetic patients (87.7%, 95% CI 84.1-91.3%), patients with acute brain injury (84.5%, 95% CI 80.5-88.5%), patients with a recent seizure (74.4%, 95% CI 69.6-79.3%), patients with advanced liver disease (64.0%, 95% CI 58.7-69.3%), and for patients with acute myocardial infarction (64.0%, 95% CI 58.7-69.3%). Physicians expressed more concern than nurses about avoiding hyperglycemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction ( P=0.0004). ICU clinicians raised concerns about the accuracy of glucometer measurements in critically ill patients (46.1%, 95% CI 40.5-51.6%).
conclusionsAttention to these beliefs and attitudes could enhance the success of future clinical, educational and research efforts to modify clinician behavior and achieve better glycemic control in the ICU setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.