ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2004
Peripheral kappa-opioid agonists for visceral pain.
Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06003218 (Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combined With Oxycodone for Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Liver Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combined With Oxycodone for Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Liver Cancer: a Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of analgesic effect of oxycodone and morphine on patients with moderate and advanced cancer pain: a meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2018Pooled it
- Intraoperative remimazolam-nalbuphine infusion reduces visceral traction response during cesarean delivery: a randomised trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of nalbuphine vs. pethidine in oocyte retrieval: a non-inferiority, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Trial
- Comparative study between nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy: randomized comparative trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- A randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of oxycodone and sufentanil on postoperative analgesia and immune function for laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Oxycodone versus Sufentanil for Postoperative Recovery in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Optimal Post-Operative Nalbuphine Dose Regimen: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Trial
- The analgesic effect of tramadol combined with butorphanol on uterine cramping pain after repeat caesarean section: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Trial
- Sedation and Analgesia for Liver Cancer Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: Fentanyl and Oxycodone Comparison.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Trial
- Preemptive oxycodone is superior to equal dose of sufentanil to reduce visceral pain and inflammatory markers after surgery: a randomized controlled trail.BMC anesthesiology · 2019Trial
- Efficacy of Nalbuphine with Flurbiprofen on Multimodal Analgesia with Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Open Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial.Pain research & management · 2018Trial
- Comparison of nalbuphine and sufentanil for colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2017Trial
- κ Agonists as a novel therapy for menopausal hot flashes.Menopause (New York, N.Y.) · 2015Trial
- A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of a peripheral κ-opioid receptor agonist CR665 and oxycodone.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2013Trial
- A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of oral oxycodone in a human experimental pain model of hyperalgesia.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2010Trial
- Different effects of morphine and oxycodone in experimentally evoked hyperalgesia: a human translational study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010Trial
- Effect of butorphanol in combination with xylazine during castration of calves: A randomised trial under field conditions.The Veterinary record · 2026Article
- Kappa opioid receptors in excitatory spinal neurons gate acute pain: evidence from mouse and human.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- κ-Opioid Receptor Agonists as Robust Pain-Modulating Agents: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential in Pain Modulation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kappa (kappa)-opioid receptor agonists are particularly effective analgesics in experimental models of visceral pain. Their analgesic effects are mediated in the periphery. The molecular targets involved include peripherally located kappa-receptors and possibly, at least for some nonpeptidic kappa-agonists, additional nonopioid molecular targets such as sodium channels located on primary sensory afferents. Overall, these properties are expected to be of therapeutic interest in various visceral pain conditions, including abdominal surgery associated with postoperative pain and ileus, pancreatitis pain, dysmenorrhea, labor pain and functional disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome or dyspepsia. The first kappa-agonists to be developed were brain-penetrating organic small molecules. Their development was eventually discontinued due to central side effects such as sedation and dysphoria attributed to kappa-receptors located behind the blood-brain barrier. New drug discovery programs are now geared towards the design of peripherally-selective kappa-agonists. So far, most of the organic molecule-based peripheral kappa-agonists have achieved limited peripheral selectivity and a practically insufficient therapeutic window to justify full development. These compounds have been used in a small number of clinical pilot studies involving visceral pain. Although encouraging, the clinical data available so far with this class of compounds are too limited and fragmented to fully validate the therapeutic utility of kappa-agonists in visceral pain. Additional clinical studies with safer kappa-agonists (i.e. with higher peripheral selectivity) are still required. The most suitable tools to address this question in the future appear to be the newly discovered class of tetrapeptide-based kappa-agonists, which have shown unprecedented levels of peripheral selectivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.