Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15049508›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2004

Molecular signals into the insular cortex and amygdala during aversive gustatory memory formation.

Federico Bermúdez-Rattoni, Leticia Ramírez-Lugo, Ranier Gutiérrez, María Isabel Miranda

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Taste Processing: Insights from Animal Models.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Microglial activation enhances associative taste memory through purinergic modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Associatively learned representations of taste outcomes activate taste-encoding neural ensembles in gustatory cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico Bermúdez-RattoniDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Cellular Physiology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-253, 04510 México DF, México. fbermude@ifisiol.unam.mx
Leticia Ramírez-Lugo
Ranier Gutiérrez
María Isabel Miranda
Neurosciences Institute · USUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we will provide evidence of the putative molecular signals and biochemical events that mediate the formation of long-lasting gustatory memory trace. When an animal drinks a novel taste (the conditioned stimulus; CS) and it is later associated with malaise (unconditioned stimulus; US), the animal will reject it in the next presentation, developing a long-lasting taste aversion, i.e., the taste cue becomes an aversive signal, and this is referred to as conditioning taste aversion. Different evidence indicates that the novel stimulus (taste) induces a rapid and strong cortical acetylcholine activity that decreases when the stimulus becomes familiar after several presentations. Cholinergic activation via muscarinic receptors initiates a series of intracellular events leading to plastic changes that could be related to short- and/or long-term memory gustatory trace. Such plastic changes facilitate the incoming US signals carried out by, in part, the glutamate release induced by the US. Altogether, these events could produce the cellular changes related to the switch from safe to aversive taste memory trace. A proposed working model to explain the biochemical sequence of signals during taste memory formation will be discussed.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsAvoidance LearningCerebral CortexHumansMemoryNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityReceptors, MuscarinicSignal TransductionTasteReceptors, Muscarinic

Identifiers

PMID15049508
PMCPMC11529945
OpenAlexW2065807147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.