Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15047960›Full record

ReviewThorax2004

Cough . 6: Which investigations are most useful in the diagnosis of chronic cough?

L P A McGarvey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Korean Cough Guideline: Recommendation and Summary Statement.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2016
    Review
  5. Review
  6. A novel diagnostic algorithm for chronic and subacute cough.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

L P A McGarveyDepartment of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Science, The Queen's University of Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, UK. l.mcgarvey@qub.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no consensus as to the best diagnostic strategy for chronic cough. Many protocols combine empirical trials of treatment with laboratory investigations. More precise diagnostic tools and improved therapeutic options are required. Until then, the management of chronic cough will remain a clinical challenge.

Indexed as

Bronchial Provocation TestsBronchoscopyChronic DiseaseClinical ProtocolsCoughGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMedical History TakingNitric OxideParanasal SinusesPhysical ExaminationSpirometrySputumTomography, X-Ray ComputedNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID15047960
PMCPMC1763813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.