Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15045482›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2004

The Evolution of SINEs and LINEs in the genus Chironomus (Diptera).

Ekaterina Papusheva, Mary C Gruhl, Eugene Berezikov, Tatiana Groudieva, Svetlana V Scherbik, Jon Martin, Alexander Blinov, Gerald Bergtrom

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ekaterina PapushevaPhysiologisches Institut, Universität Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Mary C Gruhl
Eugene Berezikov
Tatiana Groudieva
Svetlana V Scherbik
Jon Martin
Alexander Blinov
Gerald Bergtrom
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USGeorgia State University · USHamburg University of Technology · DEHubrecht Institute for Developmental Biology and Stem Cell Research · NLInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic DNA amplification from 51 species of the family Chironomidae shows that most contain relatives of NLRCth1 LINE and CTRT1 SINE retrotransposons first found in Chironomus thummi. More than 300 cloned PCR products were sequenced. The amplified region of the reverse transcriptase gene in the LINEs is intact and highly conserved, suggesting active elements. The SINEs are less conserved, consistent with minimal/no selection after transposition. A mitochondrial gene phylogeny resolves the Chironomus genus into six lineages (Guryev et al. 2001). LINE and SINE phylogenies resolve five of these lineages, indicating their monophyletic origin and vertical inheritance. However, both the LINE and the SINE tree topologies differ from the species phylogeny, resolving the elements into "clusters I-IV" and "cluster V" families. The data suggest a descent of all LINE and SINE subfamilies from two major families. Based on the species phylogeny, a few LINEs and a larger number of SINEs are cladisitically misplaced. Most misbranch with LINEs or SINEs from species with the same families of elements. From sequence comparisons, cladistically misplaced LINEs and several misplaced SINEs arose by convergent base substitutions. More diverged SINEs result from early transposition and some are derived from multiple source SINEs in the same species. SINEs from two species (C. dorsalis, C. pallidivittatus), expected to belong to the clusters I-IV family, branch instead with cluster V family SINEs; apparently both families predate separation of cluster V from clusters I-IV species. Correlation of the distribution of active SINEs and LINEs, as well as similar 3' sequence motifs in CTRT1 and NLRCth1, suggests coevolving retrotransposon pairs in which CTRT1 transposition depends on enzymes active during NLRCth1 LINE mobility.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceChironomidaeCluster AnalysisConserved SequenceDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMolecular Sequence DataRNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAShort Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsDNA, MitochondrialDNA PrimersRNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

Identifiers

PMID15045482
OpenAlexW2075885663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.