Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15045195›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2004

[Pain treatment in geriatric patients].

H D Basler, N Griessinger, U Hankemeier, D Märkert, T Nikolaus, W Sohn

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H D BaslerInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie der Philipps-Universität Marburg. basler@med.uni-marburg.de
N Griessinger
U Hankemeier
D Märkert
T Nikolaus
W Sohn
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEKlinik Bethesda · CHPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary goal of pain treatment in geriatric patients is the maintenance of physical and mental functions. This is a precondition for activity and participation. In patients with chronic pain, multidisciplinary treatment, without excluding invasive procedures, is the most effective approach. The medication ladder, initially suggested by the WHO for cancer pain, provides a guideline for pharmacological treatment. Due to age-dependent alterations in the kinetics and dynamics of pharmaceuticals, the titration of the medication follows the rule "start low-go slow". The same principle holds true for the maintenance or augmentation of physical activity in order to escape from the activity-deconditioning cycle. Training should be based on learning theories, include pain management strategies, and incorporate psychological approaches to facilitate the active participation of the patient in the treatment program. In hospitals and nursing homes, nurses play an important role in defining the need for pain treatment and in supervising the patient in the treatment process. Despite these endeavours, a significant number of patients remain whose pain cannot be controlled sufficiently. Euthanasia on demand for a patient with untreatable pain is not admitted in Germany.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsFemaleHumansIntractable PainMalePainPain ClinicsPalliative CarePatient Care ManagementPatient Care TeamPsychotherapyAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID15045195
OpenAlexW2409361619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.