Patterns of presentation of the shaken baby syndrome: subdural and retinal haemorrhages are not necessarily signs of abuse.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Retinal haemorrhages in- head trauma resulting from falls: differential diagnosis with non-accidental trauma in patients younger than 2 years of age.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2008
   Article
2. Shaken baby syndrome.Archives of disease in childhood · 2006
   Article
3. Shaken baby syndrome.Archives of disease in childhood · 2006
   Review
4. Wrongful diagnosis of child abuse--a master theory.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome.2004
• Comment on
  Shaken baby syndrome.2004
• Comment on
  Perimacular retinal folds from childhood head trauma.2004

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as