Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15043179›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Applying a risk-adjustment framework to primary care: can we improve on existing measures?

Amy K Rosen, Robert Reid, Anne-Marie Broemeling, Carter C Rakovski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Association between fee-for-service expenditures and morbidity burden in primary care.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Article
  15. Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Multimorbidity is common to family practice: is it commonly researched?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2005
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy K RosenCenter for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, VAMC (152), Bedford, Mass 01730, USA. akrosen@bu.edu
Robert Reid
Anne-Marie Broemeling
Carter C Rakovski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcome-based performance measurement and prospective payment are common features of the current managed care environment. Increasingly, primary care clinicians and health care organizations are being asked to assume financial risk for enrolled patients based on negotiated capitation rates. Therefore, the need for methods to account for differences in risk among patients enrolled in primary care organizations has become critical. Although current risk-adjustment measures represent significant advances in the measurement of morbidity in primary care populations, they may not adequately capture all the dimensions of patient risk relevant to primary care. We propose a risk-adjustment framework for primary care that incorporates clinical features related to patients' health status and nonclinical factors related to patients' health behaviors, psychosocial factors, and social environment. Without this broad perspective, clinicians with more unhealthy and more challenging populations are at risk of being inadequately compensated and inequitably compared with peers. The risk-adjustment framework should also be of use to health care organizations that have been mandated to deliver high-quality primary care but are lacking the necessary tools.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth StatusHumansManaged Care ProgramsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CarePsychologyRisk AdjustmentSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID15043179
PMCPMC1466561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.