Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15042411›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports2004

A new tool for plant cell biology: in vivo antibody uptake in plant protoplasts.

C Brière, H Barthou, M Petitprez

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C BrièreUMR CNRS/UPS 5546, BP 17 Auzeville, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France. briere@ensat.fr
H Barthou
M Petitprez
Département Biologie et Amélioration des Plantes · FRAVL (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on the in vivo uptake of antibodies into plant protoplasts. When protoplasts of sunflower, Arabidopsis or tobacco were incubated in vivo with an antibody, this antibody was detected by immunofluorescence in the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus, depending on the location of the target protein. Furthermore, when protoplasts were cultured in the presence of antibodies, specific effects were observed. Incubation with antibodies raised against p34cdc2 led to a strong inhibition of the division rate, and a decrease in the average DNA content of protoplasts. With antibodies against HaWLIM1, a LIM domain protein of the CRP type, a negative effect on actin organisation was observed. We conclude that antibodies can penetrate plant protoplasts in vivo, and thus may be used as powerful tools for the study of protein function.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesArabidopsisBiological TransportCalreticulinCDC2 Protein KinaseCell LineCells, CulturedChickensHelianthusHumansNicotianaPlantsProtoplastsSpectrinTubulinAntibodiesCalreticulinCDC2 Protein KinaseSpectrinTubulin

Identifiers

PMID15042411
OpenAlexW2161371107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.