Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15042114›Full record

Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2004

Once-daily eprosartan mesylate in the treatment of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension: data from a 13-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter study.

H A Punzi, C F Punzi

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Olmesartan vs. ramipril in elderly hypertensive patients: review of data from two published randomized, double-blind studies.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2014
    Review
  4. Eprosartan mesylate, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist.Acta crystallographica. Section E, Structure reports online · 2011
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical profile of eprosartan: a different angiotensin II receptor blocker.Cardiovascular & hematological agents in medicinal chemistry · 2008
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H A PunziTrinity Hypertension Research Institute, Punzi Medical Center, Carrollton, TX 75006, USA. mguerriere@medisyshealth.com
C F Punzi
Hypertension Institute · USTrinity Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter, titration-to-effect study of eprosartan in patients > or =60 years of age with isolated systolic hypertension. The study consisted of a 3 to 5-week placebo run-in period, a 13-week double-blind treatment period (6-week titration with eprosartan 600-1200 mg/day, 3-week maintenance, 4-week combination therapy with hydrochlorothiazide/HCTZ 12.5 mg), and a follow-up period within 5-7 days of last treatment dose. Overall, 283 patients (placebo/P: 135; eprosartan /E: 148) were randomized [female patients-P: 55.6%, E:54.7%; white-P:66.7%, E:67.6%). Mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SitSBP) at baseline was comparable (P: 170+/-0.8 mmHg; E: 171+/-0.8 mm Hg). At monotherapy end point, eprosartan produced a significant reduction in SitSBP (E: 16.1 mmHg vs P: 8.4 mmHg; P<0.0001). In all, 57.4% of patients responded to eprosartan monotherapy. Among nonresponders, the addition of HCTZ resulted in a decrease in SitSBP from baseline (E: 21.7 mmHg; P: 14.4 mmHg; P<0.002). Reductions were also noted in Standing SBP (monotherapy: P<0.001; combination therapy: P=0.03). No reductions in SitDBP >4 mmHg were found during the study. Age, gender, and race did not have any impact on the results. Post hoc analysis showed a reduction in pulse pressure from 87.3 to 78.2 mmHg with placebo and from 87.6 to 70.7 mmHg with eprosartan monotherapy. Treatment with eprosartan in once-daily doses up to 1200 mg alone or in combination with HCTZ was well tolerated, with dizziness and asthenia being the most common side effects.

Indexed as

AcrylatesAgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart RateHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionImidazolesMaleAcrylatesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentseprosartanHydrochlorothiazideImidazolesSodium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsThiophenes

Identifiers

PMID15042114
OpenAlexW2064787583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.