Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15040792›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2003

Consumer information materials for diagnostic breast tests: women's views on information and their understanding of test results.

Heather M Davey, Jacqueline Lim, Phyllis N Butow, Alexandra L Barratt, Nehmat Houssami, Roberta Higginson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. What Australian women want and when they want it: cervical screening testing preferences, decision-making styles and information needs.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Choosing between CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnostic context: a qualitative study of influences on patient preferences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather M DaveyResearch Assistant, Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. daveyh@health.usyd.edu.au
Jacqueline Lim
Phyllis N Butow
Alexandra L Barratt
Nehmat Houssami
Roberta Higginson
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore women's views on diagnostic breast test information and elicit their preferences for this information.

designIn-depth, face-to-face interview. SETTING AND

participantsThirty-seven women who had previously participated in a population-based telephone survey.

main outcome measuresQualitative thematic analysis.

resultsAnalysis of interview transcripts revealed information about: (1) the wide range of information participants wanted about diagnostic mammography; (2) general reactions to diagnostic breast test information, including positive and negative reactions, views of test accuracy information and perceived influences on information preferences; (3) preferences for information content and presentation including the need for written information, the meaning of statistical information, different views on a simple presentation style, and variation in preferences; and (4) women's understanding of diagnostic test results.

conclusionWomen want a range of information about diagnostic mammography, which is relevant at different times in the decision-making and testing process. Many women have difficulty interpreting test results.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthTeaching MaterialsAdultAgedBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedNew South WalesPatient Education as TopicQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID15040792
PMCPMC5060199
OpenAlexW2043737067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.