Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15040180›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2003

The yersiniae--a model genus to study the rapid evolution of bacterial pathogens.

Brendan W Wren

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed, 378 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Integrin-activatingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Genomic epidemiology and public health implications of zoonotic monophasicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A frameshift ineLife · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Engineering a HyperstableJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Heightened Virulence ofInfection and immunity · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Occurrence and Genetic Correlations ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brendan W WrenDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK. brendan.wren@lshtm.ac.uk
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of plague, seems to have evolved from a gastrointestinal pathogen, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, in just 1,500-20,000 years--an 'eye blink' in evolutionary time. The third pathogenic Yersinia, Yersinia enterocolitica, also causes gastroenteritis but is distantly related to Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis. Why do the two closely related species cause remarkably different diseases, whereas the distantly related enteropathogens cause similar symptoms? The recent availability of whole-genome sequences and information on the biology of the pathogenic yersiniae have shed light on this paradox, and revealed ways in which new, highly virulent pathogens can evolve.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionYersiniaAnimalsGenome, BacterialGlobal HealthHumansPlaguePlasmidsPseudogenesSpecies SpecificityVirulenceYersinia enterocoliticaYersinia InfectionsYersinia pestis

Identifiers

PMID15040180
OpenAlexW1992738816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.