Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15039375›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2004

Different responses of macrophages to smooth and rough Brucella spp.: relationship to virulence.

María P Jiménez de Bagüés, Annie Terraza, Antoine Gross, Jacques Dornand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The Mechanism of Facultative Intracellular Parasitism ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Uncovering the Hidden Credentials ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  7. Canine Brucellosis: An Update.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  8. When the Going Gets Rough: The Significance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Lethality ofVirulence · 2019
    Article
  11. A Cellular Model of Infection withVeterinary sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. A Mutation in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Systems Biology Analysis of TemporalFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Swine brucellosis: current perspectives.Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Mimicking microbial strategies for the design of mucus-permeating nanoparticles for oral immunization.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

María P Jiménez de BagüésUnidad de Sanidad Animal, Servicio de Investigación Agroalimentaria, Diputación General de Aragón, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain. mpjimenezdebagues@aragob.es
Annie Terraza
Antoine Gross
Jacques Dornand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By comparing smooth wild-type Brucella strains to their rough mutants, we show that the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) O side chain of pathogenic Brucella has a dramatic impact on macrophage activation. It favors the development of virulent Brucella by preventing the synthesis of immune mediators, important for host defense. We conclude that this O chain property is firmly linked to Brucella virulence.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucella melitensisBrucella suisBrucellosisCell LineLipopolysaccharidesMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMiceMutationNitric OxideTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaVirulenceLipopolysaccharidesNitric OxideTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID15039375
PMCPMC375206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.