Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15035648›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2004

Neonatal lupus: clinical features and management.

Lela A Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A review of the literature.International journal of women's dermatology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. New aspects in the clinical spectrum of neonatal lupus.European journal of pediatrics · 2012
    Article
  14. [Connective tissue diseases in childhood].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2005
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lela A LeeDenver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO 80204, USA. lela.lee@dhha.org

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal lupus is an uncommon autoimmune disease manifested primarily by cutaneous lupus lesions and/or congenital heart block. Maternal autoantibodies of the Ro/La family are present in virtually every case, although only approximately 1% of women who have these autoantibodies will have a baby with neonatal lupus. The cutaneous lesions of neonatal lupus may be present at birth, but more often develop within the first few weeks of life. Lesions are most common on the face and scalp, often in a distinctive periorbital distribution. Lesions tend to resolve in a few weeks or months without scarring. The most common cardiac manifestation of neonatal lupus is complete heart block. Heart block typically begins in utero during the second or third trimester. In some cases, heart block begins as first- or second-degree block and then progresses to third-degree block. Complete heart block, once established, appears to be irreversible. In some cases, cardiomyopathy occurs together with complete heart block. Most cases have been noted at birth, but delayed dilated cardiomyopathy has been reported. There have been a few cases of endocardial fibroelastosis occurring in the absence of congenital heart block. Hepatobiliary disease occurs in about 10% of cases. Three types of hepatobiliary disease have been observed: liver failure occurring at birth or in utero, transient conjugated hyperbilirubinemia occurring in infants, or transient transaminase elevations occurring in infants. Hematologic disease, consisting of thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or anemia, occurs in about 10% of cases. It is common for children with neonatal lupus not to have the full expression of disease, but rather to have only one or two organ systems involved. The diagnosis rests largely on the finding of compatible clinical manifestations plus maternal autoantibodies to Ro and/or La, or, in a few cases, to U1 ribonuclear protein. Although the pathogenesis has not been conclusively established, accumulating evidence, including evidence from animal models, implicates autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of the disease. Therapeutic interventions include attempts at prevention, early intervention, and treatment of well established disease, mainly through the use of systemic corticosteroids. Optimal therapy has yet to be determined. The long-term prognosis for children who have had neonatal lupus is still under investigation, but some children who had neonatal lupus have developed other autoimmune diseases later in childhood. About half of the mothers are asymptomatic at the time of presentation of the child, but some of these women eventually develop symptoms of autoimmune disease.

Indexed as

PrognosisAnimalsChildFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLupus Erythematosus, CutaneousMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.