Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15035025›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2003

SARS--beginning to understand a new virus.

Konrad Stadler, Vega Masignani, Markus Eickmann, Stephan Becker, Sergio Abrignani, Hans-Dieter Klenk, Rino Rappuoli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 299 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
299citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

299 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 569 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Nanobodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 variants.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Design, Synthesis and Biological Exploration of NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

239 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Konrad StadlerIRIS, Chiron S.r.l., Via Fiorentina 1, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Vega Masignani
Markus Eickmann
Stephan Becker
Sergio Abrignani
Hans-Dieter Klenk
Rino Rappuoli
Iris Vernici (Italy) · ITPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 114-day epidemic of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) swept 29 countries, affected a reported 8,098 people, left 774 patients dead and almost paralyzed the Asian economy. Aggressive quarantine measures, possibly aided by rising summer temperatures, successfully terminated the first eruption of SARS and provided at least a temporal break, which allows us to consolidate what we have learned so far and plan for the future. Here, we review the genomics of the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV), its phylogeny, antigenic structure, immune response and potential therapeutic interventions should the SARS epidemic flare up again.

Indexed as

GenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsGenome, ViralHumansSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusViral ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15035025
PMCPMC7097337
OpenAlexW1545528913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.