ArticleDer Orthopade2004
[Problems with expert opinion for the assessment of septic arthritis].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Significance of clinically latent bacterial arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial arthritis is a rare and usually protracted disease and complication which can cause substantial permanent damage. At the first indication of such an infection, rapid and efficient therapy is required. In general, after a rapid diagnosis and subsequent therapy in early stage of the disease, a complete cure should be effected. In the case of children timely diagnosis and therapy lead to a very good chance of cure. In the case of adults under 50 years, the chances of a cure after an infectious arthritis are still good to very good. For patients older than 50, however, the chances of permanent damage after a joint infection are high. Severe damage in the region of a joint frequently leads to the accusation of medical error. Due to the often undetermined reasons for an infection, common pre- and concurrent illnesses, the long course of the disease, and the often substantial long-term damage, it is necessary for the medical specialist asked for an expert opinion on the question of cause to be particularly careful. The expert must take into consideration not only the permanent damage but must also estimate the future consequences of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15034653What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.