Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15034653›Full record

ArticleDer Orthopade2004

[Problems with expert opinion for the assessment of septic arthritis].

C Neugebauer, R Graf

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Orthopade, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C NeugebauerKlagenfurt, Austria. dr.neugebauer@bios.at
R Graf

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial arthritis is a rare and usually protracted disease and complication which can cause substantial permanent damage. At the first indication of such an infection, rapid and efficient therapy is required. In general, after a rapid diagnosis and subsequent therapy in early stage of the disease, a complete cure should be effected. In the case of children timely diagnosis and therapy lead to a very good chance of cure. In the case of adults under 50 years, the chances of a cure after an infectious arthritis are still good to very good. For patients older than 50, however, the chances of permanent damage after a joint infection are high. Severe damage in the region of a joint frequently leads to the accusation of medical error. Due to the often undetermined reasons for an infection, common pre- and concurrent illnesses, the long course of the disease, and the often substantial long-term damage, it is necessary for the medical specialist asked for an expert opinion on the question of cause to be particularly careful. The expert must take into consideration not only the permanent damage but must also estimate the future consequences of the disease.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationArthritis, InfectiousBacterial InfectionsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsHumansPrognosisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.