Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15034543›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2004

Prediction of mobilisation failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

T Kuittinen, T Nousiainen, P Halonen, E Mahlamäki, E Jantunen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prediction of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Patients with Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin LymphomaTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Advances in mobilization of autologous hematopoietic stem cells].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T KuittinenDepartment of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. taru.kuittinen@kuh.fi
T Nousiainen
P Halonen
E Mahlamäki
E Jantunen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors affecting progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) are incompletely understood. We have analysed factors predicting mobilisation failure in 97 consecutive patients with NHL (59 males, 38 females; median age 49 years) who received mobilisation with intermediate-dose CY (4 g/m(2)) followed by G-CSF. The histology included large cell B (N=50), mantle cell (N=16), follicular (N=16) and other NHL (N=15). The disease status was 1CR/PR/primary refractory in 66 patients and >1 CR/PR in 31 patients. The minimum criterion for successful mobilisation was the collection of >or=1.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells. In all, 18 patients (19%) failed to reach this threshold. In univariate analysis, premobilisation factors associated with mobilisation failure included BM involvement at the time of diagnosis (P=0.001) or prior to mobilisation (P=0.001) and low platelet count just prior to mobilisation (P=0.001). In multivariate analysis, only BM involvement at diagnosis (P=0.004) and platelet count just prior to mobilisation (P=0.01) were associated with mobilisation failure. A mathematical model based on these two factors and presented in the form of a receiver operating characteristics curve showed a sensitivity of 0.71 and a specificity of 0.77 in the prediction of mobilisation failure. Patients at a high risk of mobilisation failure may benefit from novel approaches.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationAdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, CD34Bone MarrowCohort StudiesFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalMultivariate AnalysisRiskAntigens, CD34Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID15034543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.