Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15034055›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2004

Induction of a rapid and strong antigen-specific intraepithelial lymphocyte response during oral Encephalitozoon cuniculi infection.

Magali Moretto, Louis M Weiss, Imtiaz A Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Immune Response to Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022
    Article
  8. Chronic Infections in Mammals Due to Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022
    Article
  9. High Frequency ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Magali MorettoDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Louis M Weiss
Imtiaz A Khan

Funding

New Opportunistic Infections in AIDS MicrosporidosisR01AI031788 · NIAID · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI WEISS, LOUIS M. · 1992 to 2011
$4.6M
ENCEPHALITOZOAN CUNICULI--HOST IMMUNITY AND PATHOGENESISR01AI043693 · NIAID · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI KHAN, IMTIAZ AHMED · 1998 to 2008
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI31788NIAID NIH HHS AI43693NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI031788NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI043693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Encephalitozoon cuniculi continues to pose a problem for immunocompromised patients. Previous studies from our laboratory have elucidated the importance of the CD8(+) T cell subset in the protection against systemic parasite infection. There have been no studies related to the mucosal immunity induced against this orally acquired pathogen. In the present study, the immune response generated in the gut after oral E. cuniculi infection was evaluated. An early and rapid increase of the intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) population of orally infected animals was observed. This increase in the IEL population started as early as day 3 and peaked at day 7 postinfection with persistent elevation thereafter. At day 7 postinfection, IELs expressed strong cytokine messages (IFN-gamma and IL-10) and were highly cytotoxic for parasite-infected syngeneic macrophages. At an E:T ratio of 80:1, these cells were able to cause >60% Ag-specific target cell lysis. A significant increase in the CD8alphaalpha subset of IEL in response to an oral E. cuniculi infection was observed. To the best of our knowledge, such an early expansion of an IEL population exhibiting strong ex vivo cytotoxicity has not been reported with infectious models. These data suggest that IELs act as important barriers for multiplication of this organism leading to the successful resolution of infection. The protective role of IELs may be due both to their inflammatory (IFN-gamma production and cytotoxic response) as well as immunoregulatory (IL-10 production) properties.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdoptive TransferAnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8 AntigensCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell DivisionCytokinesCytotoxicity, ImmunologicDisease SusceptibilityEncephalitozoon cuniculiEncephalitozoonosisFemaleInterferon-gammaIntestinal MucosaAntigens, ProtozoanCD8 AntigensCD8beta antigenCytokinesInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID15034055
PMCPMC3086354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.