Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15033841›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood2004

Cycle helmet ownership and use; a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary school children in deprived areas.

D Kendrick, S Royal, Lids for Kids project team

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Promoting bicycle helmet wearing by children using non-legislative interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2007
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Helmets for Kids: evaluation of a school-based helmet intervention in Cambodia.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Demographic, socioeconomic, and attitudinal associations with children's cycle-helmet use in the absence of legislation.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2007
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Binge drinking.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D KendrickDivision of General Practice, University Park, Nottingham, UK. denise.kendrick@nottingham.ac.uk
S Royal
Lids for Kids project team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess the effectiveness of two different educational interventions plus free cycle helmets, in increasing cycle helmet ownership and use.

methodsA cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out in 28 primary schools in deprived areas of Nottingham, involving 1213 year 5 schoolchildren (age 9 and 10). Children received either a helmet + educational pack (educational pack and order form for free cycle helmet) or a helmet + multifaceted intervention (educational pack, order form for free cycle helmet, school assembly, lesson devoted to cycle helmet education, and an invitation to a school based cycling event).

resultsThe helmet + educational pack was as effective as the helmet + multifaceted intervention in terms of helmet ownership (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.50 to 4.58) and wearing (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.68). Helmet ownership significantly increased from baseline with both interventions, and wearing significantly increased from baseline with the helmet + educational pack. The interventions reduced the inequality in helmet ownership between children residing in deprived and non-deprived areas that had been present prior to the study.

conclusionsAn educational pack plus a form to order a free cycle helmet is an effective way of increasing bicycle helmet ownership and use and reduces inequalities in helmet ownership among children in deprived areas. Further work is needed to determine the length of the effect of such interventions.

Indexed as

BicyclingAccidents, TrafficChildCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHead Protective DevicesHealth EducationHumansPoverty AreasProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID15033841
PMCPMC1719862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.