ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2004
Intravenous immunoglobulin for cystic fibrosis lung disease: a case series of 16 children.
Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSome children with severe cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease develop chest tightness, recurrent dry cough, and intractable wheeze, often accompanied by deteriorating lung function and failure to expectorate sputum. In an attempt to reduce the use of regular oral corticosteroids, we treated a group of such children with monthly courses of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).
methodsThis is a retrospective case note review of 16 children, aged 3-16 years (median 13.0 years) who received 1-66 (median 7.5) courses of monthly IVIG, at a dose of 1 g/kg on two successive days for the first dose, followed by 1 g/kg monthly as a 12 hour infusion, with corticosteroid and antihistamine cover.
resultsFEV1 improved from a median (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 50% (39 to 61%) to 54% (48 to 66%), with a median (95% CI) difference of +7.5% (-1.5 to 14.5%; NS). FVC improved from 65% (60 to 77%) to 83% (70 to 89%), with a difference of +13% (4 to 22%, p = 0.01). The total daily dose/kg body weight of oral prednisolone was reduced from 0.6 (0.3 to 1.0) to 0 (0 to 0.1) mg/kg/day, with a reduction of -0.6 (-1.0 to -0.1, p = 0.006) mg/kg/day. The total daily dose of inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide equivalent) was a median (range) of 2000 microg (800-6000 microg), which was reduced to 1500 microg (0-3200 microg). The median (95% CI) difference was -400 microg (-1600 to 0 microg), p<0.05. IVIG was well tolerated and the regimen acceptable to all but one of the children. The following transient adverse reactions were seen in only one patient each: headache, fever, hypotension, aseptic meningitis, and chest tightness.
conclusionWe suggest that an n = 1 trial of IVIG in carefully selected patients with severe obstructive CF lung disease is worth considering, as for some it may lead to significant benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.