Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15033592›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Clofibrate-induced gene expression changes in rat liver: a cross-laboratory analysis using membrane cDNA arrays.

Valerie A Baker, Helen M Harries, Jeff F Waring, Colette M Duggan, Hong A Ni, Robert A Jolly, Lawrence W Yoon, Angus T De Souza, Judith E Schmid, Roger H Brown and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Toxicogenomic biomarkers for liver toxicity.Journal of toxicologic pathology · 2009
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valerie A BakerSafety and Environmental Assurance Centre, Unilever Research Colworth, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom. val.baker@sanofi-synthelabo.com
Helen M Harries
Jeff F Waring
Colette M Duggan
Hong A Ni
Robert A Jolly
Lawrence W Yoon
Angus T De Souza
Judith E Schmid
Roger H Brown
Roger G Ulrich
John C Rockett
Unilever (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarrays have the potential to significantly impact our ability to identify toxic hazards by the identification of mechanistically relevant markers of toxicity. To be useful for risk assessment, however, microarray data must be challenged to determine reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. As part of a series of studies conducted by the International Life Sciences Institute Health and Environmental Science Institute Technical Committee on the Application of Genomics to Mechanism-Based Risk Assessment, the biological response in rats to the hepatotoxin clofibrate was investigated. Animals were treated with high (250 mg/kg/day) or low (25 mg/kg/day) doses for 1, 3, or 7 days in two laboratories. Clinical chemistry parameters were measured, livers removed for histopathological assessment, and gene expression analysis was conducted using cDNA arrays. Expression changes in genes involved in fatty acid metabolism (e.g., acyl-CoA oxidase), cell proliferation (e.g., topoisomerase II-Alpha), and fatty acid oxidation (e.g., cytochrome P450 4A1), consistent with the mechanism of clofibrate hepatotoxicity, were detected. Observed differences in gene expression levels correlated with the level of biological response induced in the two in vivo studies. Generally, there was a high level of concordance between the gene expression profiles generated from pooled and individual RNA samples. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to confirm modulations for a number of peroxisome proliferator marker genes. Though the results indicate some variability in the quantitative nature of the microarray data, this appears due largely to differences in experimental and data analysis procedures used within each laboratory. In summary, this study demonstrates the potential for gene expression profiling to identify toxic hazards by the identification of mechanistically relevant markers of toxicity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnimalsClofibrateHypolipidemic AgentsLiverMaleObserver VariationPolymerase Chain ReactionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRNAClofibrateHypolipidemic AgentsRNA

Identifiers

PMID15033592
PMCPMC1241896
OpenAlexW2084486974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.