Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15033578›Full record

ReviewBiochimica et biophysica acta2004

Gap junction channel gating.

Feliksas F Bukauskas, Vytas K Verselis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond the gap: moonlighting functions of connexins in cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Chemical Chaperone Restores Connexin 26 Mutant Activity.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feliksas F BukauskasDepartment of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, 1300 Morris Park Ave., Bronx, New York, NY 10461-1602, USA. fbukaysk@aecom.yu.edu
Vytas K Verselis

Funding

MECHANISMS OF GATING AND PERMEATION IN GAP JUNCTIONSR01GM054179 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI VERSELIS, VYTAUTAS K · 1996 to 2018
$5.3M
Gap Junction Channels Formation and GatingR01NS036706 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI BUKAUSKAS, FELIKSAS · 1999 to 2007
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM54179NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054179NINDS NIH HHS NS36706NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades, the view of gap junction (GJ) channel gating has changed from one with GJs having a single transjunctional voltage-sensitive (V(j)-sensitive) gating mechanism to one with each hemichannel of a formed GJ channel, as well as unapposed hemichannels, containing two, molecularly distinct gating mechanisms. These mechanisms are termed fast gating and slow or 'loop' gating. It appears that the fast gating mechanism is solely sensitive to V(j) and induces fast gating transitions between the open state and a particular substate, termed the residual conductance state. The slow gating mechanism is also sensitive to V(j), but there is evidence that this gate may mediate gating by transmembrane voltage (V(m)), intracellular Ca(2+) and pH, chemical uncouplers and GJ channel opening during de novo channel formation. A distinguishing feature of the slow gate is that the gating transitions appear to be slow, consisting of a series of transient substates en route to opening and closing. Published reports suggest that both sensorial and gating elements of the fast gating mechanism are formed by transmembrane and cytoplamic components of connexins among which the N terminus is most essential and which determines gating polarity. We propose that the gating element of the slow gating mechanism is located closer to the central region of the channel pore and serves as a 'common' gate linked to several sensing elements that are responsive to different factors and located in different regions of the channel.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineGap JunctionsHumansIon Channel GatingKineticsMembrane Potentials

Identifiers

PMID15033578
PMCPMC2813678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.