Lifetime risk of silicosis death for quartz exposed workers among German population.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Exposure-Lag-Response in Longitudinal Studies: Application of Distributed-Lag Nonlinear Models in an Occupational Cohort.American journal of epidemiology · 2018
   Article
2. Change of exposure response over time and long-term risk of silicosis among a cohort of Chinese pottery workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2011
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Exposure-response analysis and risk assessment for silica and silicosis mortality in a pooled analysis of six cohorts.2002

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as