Recent developments in secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

1. ACCF/AHA/ACP 2009 competence and training statement: a curriculum on prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Develop a Competence and Training Statement on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease): developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; American College of Preventive Medicine; American College of Sports Medicine; American Diabetes Association; American Society of Hypertension; Association of Black Cardiologists; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Lipid Association; and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2009
   Guideline
2. [The secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in Spain. A systematic review of observational studies].Atencion primaria · 2006
   Pooled it
3. The effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation program on self efficacy of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation center.BMC research notes · 2013
   Trial
4. Long-term impact of secondary preventive treatments in patients with stable angina.European journal of epidemiology · 2011
   Trial
5. VCP-related myopathy: a case series and a review of literature.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2023
   Review
6. Cardiac rehabilitation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015
   Review
7. Efficiency of rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2015
   Article
8. Ten years' research on a cardiovascular tonic: a comprehensive approach-from quality control and mechanisms of action to clinical trial.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
   Review
9. Income-related inequity in initiation of evidence-based therapies among patients with acute myocardial infarction.Journal of general internal medicine · 2011
   Article
10. Costs and effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation for dialysis patients following coronary bypass.Kidney international · 2008
    Article
11. Principles help to analyse but often give no solution--secondary prevention after a cardiac event.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2006
    Review
12. [The importance of rehabilitation with cardiovascular diabetic patients after surgical interventions].Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2006
    Article
13. Cardiac rehabilitation: Appraisal of current evidence and utility of technology aided home-based cardiac rehabilitation.Indian heart journal
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Erratum issued

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as