Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15031027›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2004

Relative rates of non-pneumonic SARS coronavirus infection and SARS coronavirus pneumonia.

Patrick C Y Woo, Susanna K P Lau, Hoi-wah Tsoi, Kwok-hung Chan, Beatrice H L Wong, Xiao-yan Che, Victoria K P Tam, Sidney C F Tam, Vincent C C Cheng, Ivan F N Hung and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparison of Cell Fusions Induced by Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Upper Airways Spray for Viral Infections Prevention.Journal of immunology research · 2022
    Observational
  12. COVID-19: why not learn from the past?Frontiers of medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick C Y WooDepartment of Microbiology, University of Hong Kong, University Pathology Building, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Susanna K P Lau
Hoi-wah Tsoi
Kwok-hung Chan
Beatrice H L Wong
Xiao-yan Che
Victoria K P Tam
Sidney C F Tam
Vincent C C Cheng
Ivan F N Hung
Samson S Y Wong
Bo-jian Zheng
Yi Guan
Kwok-yung Yuen
University of Hong Kong · HKQueen Mary Hospital · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the genome of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) has been sequenced and a possible animal reservoir identified, seroprevalence studies and mass screening for detection of subclinical and non-pneumonic infections are still lacking.

methodsWe cloned and purified the nucleocapsid protein and spike polypeptide of SARS-CoV and examined their immunogenicity with serum from patients with SARS-CoV pneumonia. An ELISA based on recombinant nucleocapsid protein for IgG detection was tested with serum from 149 healthy blood donors who donated 3 years previously and with serum positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV (by indirect immunofluorescence assay) from 106 patients with SARS-CoV pneumonia. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV was studied with the ELISA in healthy blood donors who donated during the SARS outbreak in Hong Kong, non-pneumonic hospital inpatients, and symptom-free health-care workers. All positive samples were confirmed by two separate western-blot assays (with recombinant nucleocapsid protein and recombinant spike polypeptide).

findingsWestern-blot analysis showed that the nucleocapsid protein and spike polypeptide of SARS-CoV are highly immunogenic. The specificity of the IgG antibody test (ELISA with positive samples confirmed by the two western-blot assays) was 100%, and the sensitivity was 94.3%. Three of 400 healthy blood donors who donated during the SARS outbreak and one of 131 non-pneumonic paediatric inpatients were positive for IgG antibodies, confirmed by the two western-blot assays (total, 0.48% of our study population).

interpretationOur findings support the existence of subclinical or non-pneumonic SARS-CoV infections. Such infections are more common than SARS-CoV pneumonia in our locality.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsBlotting, WesternChinaCoronavirusCross InfectionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoglobulin GMembrane GlycoproteinsNucleocapsid ProteinsPneumonia, ViralRecombinant ProteinsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusViral Envelope ProteinsImmunoglobulin GMembrane GlycoproteinsNucleocapsid ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike glycoprotein, SARS-CoVViral Envelope Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15031027
PMCPMC7112439
OpenAlexW2158939655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.