ArticleNucleic acids research2004
Microarray segmentation methods significantly influence data precision.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variance-Preserving Estimation of Intensity Values Obtained From Omics Experiments.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Correction of spatial bias in oligonucleotide array data.Advances in bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Modulating microtubule stability enhances the cytotoxic response of cancer cells to Paclitaxel.Cancer research · 2011Article
- A glance at DNA microarray technology and applications.BioImpacts : BI · 2011Article
- Transgenic increases in seed oil content are associated with the differential expression of novel Brassica-specific transcripts.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- Image analysis and data normalization procedures are crucial for microarray analyses.Gene regulation and systems biology · 2008Article
- Absence of p300 induces cellular phenotypic changes characteristic of epithelial to mesenchyme transition.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
- Comparison of transcript profiling on Arabidopsis microarray platform technologies.Plant molecular biology · 2005Article
- Microarrays and breast cancer clinical studies: forgetting what we have not yet learnt.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little consideration has been given to the effect of different segmentation methods on the variability of data derived from microarray images. Previous work has suggested that the significant source of variability from microarray image analysis is from estimation of local background. In this study, we used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) models to investigate the effect of methods of segmentation on the precision of measurements obtained from replicate microarray experiments. We used four different methods of spot segmentation (adaptive, fixed circle, histogram and GenePix) to analyse a total number of 156 172 spots from 12 microarray experiments. Using a two-way ANOVA model and the coefficient of repeatability, we show that the method of segmentation significantly affects the precision of the microarray data. The histogram method gave the lowest variability across replicate spots compared to other methods, and had the lowest pixel-to-pixel variability within spots. This effect on precision was independent of background subtraction. We show that these findings have direct, practical implications as the variability in precision between the four methods resulted in different numbers of genes being identified as differentially expressed. Segmentation method is an important source of variability in microarray data that directly affects precision and the identification of differentially expressed genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.