ArticleJournal of bacteriology2004
DNA sequence duplication in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: evidence of an ancient partnership between chromosomes I and II.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphate limitation increases coenzyme QSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2019Article
- The Divided Bacterial Genome: Structure, Function, and Evolution.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017Review
- Catalytic efficiency diversification of duplicate β-1,3-1,4-glucanases from Neocallimastix patriciarum J11.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2012Article
- The prevalence of gene duplications and their ancient origin in Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1.BMC microbiology · 2010Article
- Vibrio chromosomes share common history.BMC microbiology · 2010Article
- PflI, a protein involved in flagellar positioning in Caulobacter crescentus.Journal of bacteriology · 2008Article
- A complete set of flagellar genes acquired by horizontal transfer coexists with the endogenous flagellar system in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.Journal of bacteriology · 2007Article
- Genome analyses of three strains of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: evidence of rapid evolution of chromosome II.Journal of bacteriology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complex genome of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1, composed of chromosomes I (CI) and II (CII), has been sequenced and assembled. We present data demonstrating that the R. sphaeroides genome possesses an extensive amount of exact DNA sequence duplication, 111 kb or approximately 2.7% of the total chromosomal DNA. The chromosomal DNA sequence duplications were aligned to each other by using MUMmer. Frequency and size distribution analyses of the exact DNA duplications revealed that the interchromosomal duplications occurred prior to the intrachromosomal duplications. Most of the DNA sequence duplications in the R. sphaeroides genome occurred early in species history, whereas more recent sequence duplications are rarely found. To uncover the history of gene duplications in the R. sphaeroides genome, 44 gene duplications were sampled and then analyzed for DNA sequence similarity against orthologous DNA sequences. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that approximately 80% of the total gene duplications examined displayed type A phylogenetic relationships; i.e., one copy of each member of a duplicate pair was more similar to its orthologue, found in a species closely related to R. sphaeroides, than to its duplicate, counterpart allele. The data reported here demonstrate that a massive level of gene duplications occurred prior to the origin of the R. sphaeroides 2.4.1 lineage. These findings lead to the conclusion that there is an ancient partnership between CI and CII of R. sphaeroides 2.4.1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.