Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15026437›Full record

Trial reportJournal of epidemiology and community health2004

Putting public health evidence into practice: increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing.

H Roberts, K Curtis, K Liabo, D Rowland, C DiGuiseppi, I Roberts

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers to, and facilitators of, the prevention of unintentional injury in children in the home: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2005
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Implementation fidelity of the 'Stay One Step Ahead' home safety intervention: a mixed-methods analysis.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How has research in the past 5 years changed my practice?Archives of disease in childhood · 2007
    Review
  12. Evidence into practice: combining the art and science of injury prevention.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2006
    Article
  13. Road safety campaigns: do they work?Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2005
    Article
  14. Review
  15. The Difficulty of Prevention: A Behavioral Perspective.American journal of lifestyle medicine
    Review
  16. Fire-related deaths among Aboriginal people in British Columbia, 1991-2001.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H RobertsChild Health Research and Policy Unit, City University, London, UK.
K Curtis
K Liabo
D Rowland
C DiGuiseppi
I Roberts
City, University of London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesThe UK government recommends that local authorities install battery operated smoke alarms to prevent fire related injury. However, a randomised controlled trial of smoke alarm installation in local authority housing found a low level of working alarms at follow up. Qualitative work, which accompanied the trial explored barriers and levers to the use of this public health intervention.

designSemi-structured group and individual interviews were conducted with a sample of the adult participants in a randomised controlled trial of free smoke alarm installation. Group interviews and "draw and write" exercises were conducted with children at a local primary school.

participantsA sample of trial participants and primary school children in the trial neighbourhood.

settingAn inner city housing estate in central London. MAIN

resultsThe main barrier to smoke alarm use was the distress caused by false alarms. Although trial participants considered themselves to be at high risk for fires and would recommend smoke alarms to others, respondents' reports on the distress caused by false alarms suggest that people balance immediate and longer term risks to their health and wellbeing when they disable alarms.

conclusionsThis study identified some of the reasons for the low level of functioning smoke alarms, and problems experienced with alarms. The results have implications for the implementation of this public health intervention. The effectiveness of smoke alarm installation could be improved if alarm manufacturers and those responsible for implementation programmes considered ways of tackling the issues raised in this study.

Indexed as

Accident PreventionFiresSmokeAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedPoverty AreasProtective DevicesPublic HousingUrban HealthSmoke

Identifiers

PMID15026437
PMCPMC1732727
OpenAlexW1969549009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.