Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15023231›Full record

ArticleClinical and molecular allergy : CMA2004

Low-dose, long-term macrolide therapy in asthma: An overview.

Umur Hatipoglu, Israel Rubinstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Prophylactic macrolides for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the community: a decision for GPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  3. Usefulness of targeting lymphocyte Kv1.3-channels in the treatment of respiratory diseases.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Induction of IL-8 by Mycoplasma pneumoniae membrane in BEAS-2B cells.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2008
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Umur HatipogluSection of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Colleges of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, and VA Chicago Health Care System, Chicago, Illinois 60612, U,S,A. IRubinst@uic.edu
Israel Rubinstein
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrolides, a class of antimicrobials isolated from Streptomycetes more than 50 years ago, are used extensively to treat sinopulmonary infections in humans. In addition, a growing body of experimental and clinical evidence indicates that long-term (years), low (sub-antimicrobial)-dose 14- and 15-membered ring macrolide antibiotics, such as erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin and azithromycin, express immunomodulatory and tissue reparative effects that are distinct from their anti-infective properties. These salutary effects are operative in various lung disorders, including diffuse panbronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis, persistent chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, bronchiectasis, asthma and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia.The purpose of this overview is to outline the immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics in patients with asthma.

Identifiers

PMID15023231
PMCPMC394343
OpenAlexW2148092970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.