ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2004
Low yield of ancillary diagnostic studies in neonates infected with Candida.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neonatal Candida infections in Brazil: study on virulence and antifungal susceptibility with predominance of non-albicans Candida.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFungal infection can be a significant complication for the critically ill neonate. However, the usefulness of extensive radiologic and ophthalmologic investigations in this population has not been thoroughly elucidated.
objectiveTo report the incidence of organ fungal involvement diagnosed by ancillary testing (echocardiogram, ophthalmologic examination, brain imaging, and renal ultrasound (RUS)) among neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients with Candida infection.
methodsThis was a single center review of all NICU patients with Candida-positive cultures of blood, urine, peritoneal fluid, endotracheal tube aspirate, or cerebrospinal fluid from January 1, 1997 to June 1 2002. Data regarding the number of positive cultures, species isolated, and presence of specific risk factors and clinical symptoms were recorded for each case, as well as occurrence, timing and results of ancillary testing.
resultsIn all, 66 patients had at least one positive culture for Candida. The majority (71%) were <1500 g at birth, and mean gestational age was 29.5+/-5.6 weeks. Echocardiograms were obtained in 54/66 (82%), and ophthalmology examinations were obtained in 36/66 (55%); none of these was consistent with fungal involvement. Brain imaging was performed in 50/66 (76%), only one of which was positive, in a patient with 16 positive blood cultures for Candida albicans. RUS were performed in 58/66 (88%) of patients, with concerning findings for fungal involvement in seven of the studies. RUS findings alone did not appear to consistently influence the length of therapy.
conclusionsAncillary evaluations to investigate for fungal dissemination were undertaken frequently, but were of overall low yield. Although ancillary testing may be of limited additional value in centers with a low threshold for suspecting fungal infections and an aggressive approach to therapy, potentially important findings, which could impact management, may occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15014535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.