Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15013990›Full record

ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2004

Preventive effects of Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 on acute and chronic intestinal inflammation in two different murine models of colitis.

Michael Schultz, Ulrike G Strauch, Hans-Jörg Linde, Sonja Watzl, Florian Obermeier, Claudia Göttl, Nadja Dunger, Nicole Grunwald, Jürgen Schölmerich, Heiko C Rath

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gut Microbiota-Based Immunotherapy: EngineeredMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Administration ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael SchultzDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Regensburg, Regensburg 93042, Germany. michael.schultz@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
Ulrike G Strauch
Hans-Jörg Linde
Sonja Watzl
Florian Obermeier
Claudia Göttl
Nadja Dunger
Nicole Grunwald
Jürgen Schölmerich
Heiko C Rath
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) is as effective in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis as is treatment with mesalazine. This study aims to evaluate murine models of acute and chronic intestinal inflammation to study the antiinflammatory effect of EcN in vivo. Acute colitis was induced in mice with 2% dextran-sodium sulfate (DSS) in drinking water. EcN was administered from day -2 to day +7. Chronic colitis was induced by transfer of CD4(+) CD62L(+) T lymphocytes from BALB/c mice in SCID mice. EcN was administered three times/week from week 1 to week 8 after cell transfer. Mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cytokine secretion (of gamma interferon [IFN-gamma], interleukin 5 [IL-5], IL-6, and IL-10) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Histologic sections of the colon were analyzed by using a score system ranging from 0 to 4. Intestinal contents and homogenized MLN were cultured, and the number of E. coli-like colonies was determined. EcN was identified by repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) PCR. EcN administration to DSS-treated mice reduced the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (IFN-gamma, 32,477 +/- 6,377 versus 9,734 +/- 1,717 [P = 0.004]; IL-6, 231 +/- 35 versus 121 +/- 17 [P = 0.02]) but had no effect on the mucosal inflammation. In the chronic experimental colitis of the transfer model, EcN ameliorated the intestinal inflammation (histology score, 2.7 +/- 0.2 versus 1.9 +/- 0.3 [P = 0.02]) and reduced the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. Translocation of EcN and resident E. coli into MLN was observed in the chronic colitis model but not in healthy controls. Administration of EcN ameliorated acute and chronic experimental colitis by modifying proinflammatory cytokine secretion but had no influence on the acute DSS-induced colitis. In this model, preexisting colitis was necessary for translocation of EcN and resident E. coli into MLN.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsBacterial TranslocationCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCecumChronic DiseaseColitisCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalEscherichia coliL-SelectinLymph NodesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, SCIDProbioticsCytokinesL-Selectin

Identifiers

PMID15013990
PMCPMC371200
OpenAlexW2132878319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.