ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2004
Comparison of benchtop microplate beta counters with the traditional gamma counting method for measurement of chromium-51 release in cytotoxic assays.
Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining melanoma combination therapies that provide senolytic sensitivity in human melanoma cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Activated T cell therapy targeting glioblastoma cancer stem cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Axons are injured by antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells through a MHC class I- and granzyme B-dependent mechanism.Neurobiology of disease · 2013Article
- Advances in FIV vaccine technology.Veterinary immunology and immunopathology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most traditional method used to measure the lytic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes or natural killer (NK) cells is the chromium release assay (CRA). No study has been reported that systematically compares the traditional gamma counting method with various benchtop microplate scintillation formats to measure chromium release. Here we investigated the utilization of microplate beta counters in comparison with the traditional gamma counting method to quantitate antigen-specific cytolysis, lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) activity, and NK activity in the CRA. Supernatants from standard CRA (n = 7) were directly transferred to a 96-well microplate containing either a solid scintillant (Lumaplate) or a liquid scintillant (flexible beta plate). Samples were quantified by using two benchtop microplate beta counters, Wallac Microbeta Trilux (Lumalux and Trilux methods, respectively) and Packard TopCount instruments (TopCount method). These results were then compared with data from an identical assay run in parallel using the traditional gamma counting method (LKB). The lytic activity for influenza virus-stimulated effectors measured in the benchtop microplate beta counters using Lumalux and Trilux methods exhibited excellent correlations with the one measured in the traditional LKB (r = 0.967 and 0.968, respectively). The TopCount method demonstrated a similar correlation (r = 0.966). Similar findings were observed for LAK and NK activity. The 96-well microplate format, specifically the dry-scintillant Lumaplates, offers several advantages over the traditional gamma counting format. Most notable are the reductions in sample volume needed and in the total sample preparation and counting time. Furthermore, this system reduces the amount of dry and mixed radioactive waste generated while using the same instrument for gamma- and beta-emitting isotopes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.