ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2003
Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epistasis among clustered lineage-specific amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila Trio protein.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous constraint and adaptation across the malaria parasite life cycle.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Epistasis among clustered lineage-specific adaptive amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila Trio protein.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Between but Not Within-Species Variation in the Distribution of Fitness Effects.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Changing Population Size in McDonald-Kreitman Style Analyses: Artifactual Correlations and Adaptive Evolution between Humans and Chimpanzees.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Species-specific partial gene duplication in Arabidopsis thaliana evolved novel phenotypic effects on morphological traits under strong positive selection.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- Evidence of Adaptive Evolution inViruses · 2021Article
- Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020Review
- The Impact of Protein Architecture on Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Adaptation and Conservation throughout the Drosophila melanogaster Life-Cycle.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Article
- The Neutral Theory in Light of Natural Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- RNA-Interference Pathways Display High Rates of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Multiple Invertebrates.Genetics · 2018Article
- Natural Selection Drives Rapid Functional Evolution of Young Drosophila Duplicate Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Estimating the prevalence of functional exonic splice regulatory information.Human genetics · 2017Review
- Distributions of Mutational Effects and the Estimation of Directional Selection in Divergent Lineages ofGenetics · 2017Article
- Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Molecular Population Genetics.Genetics · 2017Review
- Detecting Adaptation in Protein-Coding Genes Using a Bayesian Site-Heterogeneous Mutation-Selection Codon Substitution Model.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the principal goals of population genetics is to understand the processes by which genetic variation within species (polymorphism) becomes converted into genetic differences between species (divergence). In this transformation, selective neutrality, near neutrality, and positive selection may each play a role, differing from one gene to the next. Synonymous nucleotide sites are often used as a uniform standard of comparison across genes on the grounds that synonymous sites are subject to relatively weak selective constraints and so may, to a first approximation, be regarded as neutral. Synonymous sites are also interdigitated with nonsynonymous sites and so are affected equally by genomic context and demographic factors. Hence a comparison of levels of polymorphism and divergence between synonymous sites and amino acid replacement sites in a gene is potentially informative about the magnitude of selective forces associated with amino acid replacements. We have analyzed 56 genes in which polymorphism data from D. simulans are compared with divergence from a reference strain of D. melanogaster. The framework of the analysis is Bayesian and assumes that the distribution of selective effects (Malthusian fitnesses) is Gaussian with a mean that differs for each gene. In such a model, the average scaled selection intensity (gamma = N(e)s) of amino acid replacements eligible to become polymorphic or fixed is -7.31, and the standard deviation of selective effects within each locus is 6.79 (assuming homoscedasticity across loci). For newly arising mutations of this type that occur in autosomal or X-linked genes, the average proportion of beneficial mutations is 19.7%. Among the amino acid polymorphisms in the sample, the expected average proportion of beneficial mutations is 47.7%, and among amino acid replacements that become fixed the average proportion of beneficial mutations is 94.3%. The average scaled selection intensity of fixed mutations is +5.1. The presence of positive selection is pervasive with the single exception of kl-5, a Y-linked fertility gene. We find no evidence that a significant fraction of fixed amino acid replacements is neutral or nearly neutral or that positive selection drives amino acid replacements at only a subset of the loci. These results are model dependent and we discuss possible modifications of the model that might allow more neutral and nearly neutral amino acid replacements to be fixed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.