ArticleDer Nervenarzt2005
[Are bonus systems applicable to guideline-oriented depression treatment provided by general practitioners and neurologists?].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Who comes from where and who goes where? Treatment methods for psychiatric inpatients].Der Nervenarzt · 2005Trial
- [Data supporting quality circle management of inpatient depression treatment].Der Nervenarzt · 2005Trial
- A survey of attitudes to clinical practice guidelines in general and adherence of the Korea practical guidelines for management of gallbladder polyp: a survey among private clinicians in Korea.Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2014Article
- Physicians' knowledge of and compliance with guidelines: an exploratory study in cardiovascular diseases.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Article
- Models of mental health care in psychiatry across sectoral borders.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the outpatient treatment of depression, the potential of diagnostic and therapeutic methods is seldom exhausted resulting in variable quality of treatment and partly insufficient cost effectiveness. Implementation of a guideline-oriented reimbursement system seems to be an option to improve quality of treatment. Corresponding incentive systems have been outlined and evaluated for the health care of somatic diseases such as diabetes. Acting on these experiences, an attempt was made to utilize them for the area of psychiatric disorders. Taking depression as an example, a model for a quality-oriented, guideline-based reimbursement system for general and specialist practice is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15007509What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.