Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15006755›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2004

Quantitative detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua by real-time PCR: assessment of hly, iap, and lin02483 targets and AmpliFluor technology.

David Rodríguez-Lázaro, Marta Hernández, Mariela Scortti, Teresa Esteve, José A Vázquez-Boland, Maria Pla

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Environmental monitoring and equipment sanitation to mitigateApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A multicenter evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx meningitis-encephalitis syndromic test kit as compared to the conventional diagnostic microbiology workflow.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Food science & nutrition · 2022
    Review
  13. Survival ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. DNA Transformations for Diagnosis and Therapy.Advanced functional materials · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Disinfection and removal of human pathogenic bacteria in arctic waste stabilization ponds.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David Rodríguez-LázaroInstitute of Food and Agricultural Technology, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Marta Hernández
Mariela Scortti
Teresa Esteve
José A Vázquez-Boland
Maria Pla
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed and assessed real-time PCR (RTi-PCR) assays for the detection and quantification of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes and the closely related nonpathogenic species L. innocua. The target genes were hly and iap for L. monocytogenes and lin02483 for L. innocua. The assays were 100% specific, as determined with 100 Listeria strains and 45 non-Listeria strains, and highly sensitive, with detection limits of one target molecule in 11 to 56% of the reactions with purified DNA and 3 CFU in 56 to 89% of the reactions with bacterial suspensions. Quantification was possible over a 5-log dynamic range, with a limit of 15 target molecules and R(2) values of >0.996. There was an excellent correspondence between the predicted and the actual numbers of CFU in the samples (deviations of <23%). The hly-based assay accurately quantified L. monocytogenes in all of the samples tested. The iap-based assay, in contrast, was unsuitable for quantification purposes, underestimating the bacterial counts by 3 to 4 log units in a significant proportion of the samples due to serovar-related target sequence variability. The combination of the two assays enabled us to classify L. monocytogenes isolates into one of the two major phylogenetic divisions of the species, I and II. We also assessed the new AmpliFluor technology for the quantitative detection of L. monocytogenes by RTi-PCR. The performance of this system was similar to that of the TaqMan system, although the former system was slightly less sensitive (detection limit of 15 molecules in 45% of the reactions) and had a higher quantification limit (60 molecules).

Indexed as

Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionBacteriological TechniquesBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersFood MicrobiologyGenes, BacterialListeriaListeria monocytogenesMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, GeneticSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID15006755
PMCPMC368366
OpenAlexW2160418859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.