Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15006124›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2004

A randomised controlled trial of three pragmatic approaches to initiate increased physical activity in sedentary patients with risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Paul Little, Martina Dorward, Sarah Gralton, Louise Hammerton, John Pillinger, Peter White, Michael Moore, Jim McKenna, Sheila Payne

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Promoting physical activity in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nurse delivered lifestyle interventions in primary health care to treat chronic disease risk factors associated with obesity: a systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: a review update.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A short walk! A feasible fitness test for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2004
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul LittlePrimary Medical Care, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre Practice, Southampton. P.Little@soton.ac.uk
Martina Dorward
Sarah Gralton
Louise Hammerton
John Pillinger
Peter White
Michael Moore
Jim McKenna
Sheila Payne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but it is unclear what combination of feasible approaches, using existing resources in primary care, work best to initiate increased physical activity.

aimTo assess three approaches to initiate increased physical activity. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled (2 X 2 X 2) factorial trial.

settingFour general practices.

methodOne hundred and fifty-one sedentary patients with computer documented risk factors for cardiovascular disease were randomised to eight groups defined by three factors: prescription by general practitioners (GPs) for brisk exercise not requiring a leisure facility (for example, walking) 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week; counselling by practice nurses, based on psychological theory to modify intentions and perceived control of behaviour, and using behavioural implementation techniques (for example, contracting, 'rehearsal'); use of the Health Education Authority booklet 'Getting active, feeling fit'.

resultsSingle interventions had modest effects. There was a trend from the least intensive interventions (control +/- booklet) to the more intensive interventions (prescription and counselling combined +/- booklet) for both increased physical activity and fitness (test for trend, P = 0.02 and P = 0.05, respectively). Only with the most intense intervention (prescription and counselling combined) were there significant increases in both physical activity and fitness from baseline (Godin score = 14.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.8 to 21, which was equivalent to three 15-minute sessions of brisk exercise and a 6-minute walking distance = 28.5 m, respectively, 95% CI = 11.1 to 45.8). Counselling only made a difference among those individuals with lower intention at baseline.

conclusionFeasible interventions using available staff, which combine exercise prescription and counselling explicitly based on psychological theory, can probably initiate important increases in physical activity.

Indexed as

ExerciseAnalysis of VarianceBehavior TherapyCardiovascular DiseasesDirective CounselingFamily PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID15006124
PMCPMC1314829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.