Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15005240›Full record

ReviewHuman cell2003

Persistent use of false myeloma cell lines.

Hans G Drexler, Yoshinobu Matsuo, Roderick A E MacLeod

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human cell, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hans G DrexlerDSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany. hdr@dsmz.de
Yoshinobu Matsuo
Roderick A E MacLeod

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplasm of a terminally differentiated B-cell. Human myeloma cell lines were shown to be suitable model systems for use in various fields of the biological sciences. Within the last 20 years more than 100 cell lines have been established. So-called 'myeloma cell lines' have been previously reported and are still widely used which are in reality Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive B-lymphoblastoid cell lines. The presence of the EBV-genome in residual normal B-cells provides them with a selective growth advantage after explantation. Cell lines represent an extremely important resource for research in a variety of fields and disciplines. As the cell lines are used as in vitro model systems in lieu of primary material, it is crucial that the cells in the culture flasks faithfully correspond to the purported objects of study. On closer examination, the use of false cell lines may be seen to invalidate a significant percentage of scientific work, or at least cast doubts on the relevance of these in vitro results to the cell type or tumor in vivo. Ultimately, use of cross-contaminated cell lines is a waste of human and material resources. Henceforth, it should be mandatory to prove the proper derivation of each new cell line by comparing DNA fingerprints or karyotypes of the patient's primary cells and the cultured cells. The availability of well characterized and authenticated bona fide MM cell lines is of great importance for the study of the biology, etiology and treatment of the disease.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaB-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, ViralGenome, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.