ArticleParasitology research2004
Effects of Eimeria separata infections on Na+ and Cl- transport in the rat large intestine.
Article in Parasitology research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective evaluation of acid-base imbalances, clinicopathologic alterations, and prognostic factors in hospitalized calves with Eimeria-associated diarrhea.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Pathophysiology of avian intestinal ion transport.World's poultry science journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To study the pathophysiology of diarrhoea in coccidial infections, Na+ and Cl- fluxes (J(Na), J(Cl)), short circuit current (I(sc)) and tissue conductance (g(t)) were determined in stripped gut epithelia of Eimeria separata infected rats employing the Ussing chamber technique. E. separata invades enterocytes of the caecum and proximal colon. Na+ absorption was generally reduced in infected tissues, Cl- absorption only in the caecum. I(sc) values were increased in the caecum and reduced in the proximal colon. Tissue conductance was not affected. Values tended to normal with time after infection. Theophylline caused markedly increased I(sc) and g(t) values in the caecum epithelia of infected rats. In the epithelia of the distal colon, i.e. the non-infested part of the large intestine, g(t) values remained unaffected but I(sc) was fourfold increased. This I(sc) increase was strongly sensitive to amiloride, suggesting a compensatory activation of Na+ channels in the distal colon of infected rats. Accordingly, serum levels of aldosterone, which activates Na+ channels in the distal colon, were increased to eightfold levels in infected animals. Thus compensatory Na+ absorption was under endocrine control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.