Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15004238›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2004

Genetic dissection of meiotic cytokinesis in Drosophila males.

Maria Grazia Giansanti, Rebecca M Farkas, Silvia Bonaccorsi, Dan L Lindsley, Barbara T Wakimoto, Margaret T Fuller, Maurizio Gatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insect Lipidomics: Advances, Applications, and Physiological Insights.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. COG7 deficiency inJournal of cell science · 2017
    Article
  15. Cytokinesis in Metazoa and Fungi.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. A GAP that Divides.F1000Research · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Grazia GiansantiIstituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti and Istituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari del CNR, Dipartimento di Genetica e Biologia Molecolare, Universitá La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Rebecca M Farkas
Silvia Bonaccorsi
Dan L Lindsley
Barbara T Wakimoto
Margaret T Fuller
Maurizio Gatti

Funding

GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
GENETIC DISSECTION OF CYTOKINESIS AND CELL MORPHOGENESISR01GM062276 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FULLER, MARGARET T · 2001 to 2004
$742k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062276NIGMS NIH HHS RD/GM 62276NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007790NIGMS NIH HHS Z T52 GM 07790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used Drosophila male meiosis as a model system for genetic dissection of the cytokinesis mechanism. Drosophila mutants defective in meiotic cytokinesis can be easily identified by their multinucleate spermatids. Moreover, the large size of meiotic spindles allows characterization of mutant phenotypes with exquisite cytological resolution. We have screened a collection of 1955 homozygous mutant male sterile lines for those with multinucleate spermatids, and thereby identified mutations in 19 genes required for cytokinesis. These include 16 novel loci and three genes, diaphanous, four wheel drive, and pebble, already known to be involved in Drosophila cytokinesis. To define the primary defects leading to failure of cytokinesis, we analyzed meiotic divisions in male mutants for each of these 19 genes. Examination of preparations stained for tubulin, anillin, KLP3A, and F-actin revealed discrete defects in the components of the cytokinetic apparatus, suggesting that these genes act at four major points in a stepwise pathway for cytokinesis. Our results also indicated that the central spindle and the contractile ring are interdependent structures that interact throughout cytokinesis. Moreover, our genetic and cytological analyses provide further evidence for a cell type-specific control of Drosophila cytokinesis, suggesting that several genes required for meiotic cytokinesis in males are not required for mitotic cytokinesis.

Indexed as

ActomyosinAnimalsCell NucleusChromosome MappingContractile ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenes, InsectGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsKinesinsMaleMeiosisMitosisMutationSpermatidsSpermatocytesActomyosinanillinContractile ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsKinesinsKlp3A protein, DrosophilaPbl protein, DrosophilaTubulin

Identifiers

PMID15004238
PMCPMC404041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.