Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15004062›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Multiplex PCR assay for differentiation of Helicobacter felis, H. bizzozeronii, and H. salomonis.

M Baele, K Van den Bulck, A Decostere, P Vandamme, M-L Hänninen, R Ducatelle, F Haesebrouck

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Detection of Helicobacter species in humans and their dog]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2023
    Article
  3. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M BaeleDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology, and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium. margo.baele@rug.ac.be
K Van den Bulck
A Decostere
P Vandamme
M-L Hänninen
R Ducatelle
F Haesebrouck
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helicobacter felis, Helicobacter bizzozeronii, and Helicobacter salomonis are frequently found in the gastric mucous membrane of dogs and cats. These large spiral organisms are phylogenetically highly related to each other. Their fastidious nature makes it difficult to cultivate them in vitro, hampering traditional identification methods. We describe here a multiplex PCR test based on the tRNA intergenic spacers and on the urease gene, combined with capillary electrophoresis, that allows discrimination of these three species. In combination with previously described 16S ribosomal DNA-based primers specific for the nonculturable "Candidatus Helicobacter suis," our procedure was shown to be very useful in determining the species identity of "Helicobacter heilmannii"-like organisms observed in human stomachs and will facilitate research concerning their possible zoonotic importance.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCat DiseasesCatsDNA PrimersDog DiseasesDogsGenetic MarkersHelicobacterHelicobacter felisHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialRNA, TransferDNA PrimersGenetic MarkersRNA, BacterialRNA, TransferUrease

Identifiers

PMID15004062
PMCPMC356813
OpenAlexW2133268227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.