Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15004052›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Microarray-based identification of bacteria in clinical samples by solid-phase PCR amplification of 23S ribosomal DNA sequences.

Georg Mitterer, Martin Huber, Ernst Leidinger, Claudia Kirisits, Werner Lubitz, Manfred W Mueller, Wolfgang M Schmidt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Microbiological diagnosis: Etiologic driven and syndrome driven].Antibiotiques (Paris, France : 1999) · 2009
    Article
  16. Microfluidic systems for pathogen sensing: a review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2009
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Design and validation of a low density array (Nosochip) for the detection and identification of the main pathogenic bacteria and fungi responsible for nosocomial pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2008
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Georg MittererInstitute of Microbiology & Genetics, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Martin Huber
Ernst Leidinger
Claudia Kirisits
Werner Lubitz
Manfred W Mueller
Wolfgang M Schmidt
Bioscience Research · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid identification of the bacteria in clinical samples is important for patient management and antimicrobial therapy. We describe a DNA microarray-based PCR approach for the quick detection and identification of bacteria from cervical swab specimens from mares. This on-chip PCR method combines the amplification of a variable region of bacterial 23S ribosomal DNA and the simultaneous sequence-specific detection on a solid phase. The solid phase contains bacterial species-specific primers covalently bound to a glass support. During the solid-phase amplification reaction the polymerase elongates perfectly matched primers and incorporates biotin-labeled nucleotides. The reaction products are visualized by streptavidin-cyanine 5 staining, followed by fluorescence scanning. This procedure successfully identified from pure cultures 22 bacteria that are common causes of abortion and sterility in mares. Using the on-chip PCR method, we also tested 21 cervical swab specimens from mares for the presence of pathogenic bacteria and compared the results with those of conventional bacteriological culture methods. Our method correctly identified the bacteria in 12 cervical swab samples, 8 of which contained more than one bacterial species. Due to the higher sensitivity of the on-chip PCR, this method identified bacteria in five cervical swab samples which were not detected by the conventional identification procedure. Our results show that this method will have great potential to be incorporated into the routine microbiology laboratory.

Indexed as

Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAbortion, VeterinaryAnimalsBacteriaBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalFemaleHorsesPolymerase Chain ReactionPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 23SDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID15004052
PMCPMC356827
OpenAlexW2107438575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.