Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14998744›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2004

Reductions in blood lead overestimate reductions in brain lead following repeated succimer regimens in a rodent model of childhood lead exposure.

Diane E Stangle, Myla S Strawderman, Donald Smith, Mareike Kuypers, Barbara J Strupp

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The scientific basis for chelation: animal studies and lead chelation.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2013
    Review
  6. Ginsenoside Rd maintains adult neural stem cell proliferation during lead-impaired neurogenesis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diane E StangleDepartment of Psychology, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Myla S Strawderman
Donald Smith
Mareike Kuypers
Barbara J Strupp
Cornell University · US

Funding

SUPERFUND BASIC RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAMP42ES005950 · NIEHS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI GILLETT, JAMES W · 1992 to 2000
$114k
EFFECACY OF DMSA IN REDUCING BRAIN AND TISSUE LEADR01ES007457 · NIEHS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI STRUPP, BARBARA J · 1995 to 1999
–
NIDDK NIH HHS DK 0715827NIEHS NIH HHS ES 05950NIEHS NIH HHS ES 07457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many studies have demonstrated the efficacy of succimer chelation in reducing blood and brain lead levels, the relative efficacy of the drug in the two tissues is less well understood. This issue is important because blood lead levels after chelation are used clinically to estimate reductions in the brain, the most critical organ in considering lead-induced neurotoxicity. The present study was designed to further investigate this issue, using multiple chelation regimens. Long-Evans rats were exposed to one of three lead exposure regimens from birth until postnatal day 40, followed by treatment with succimer (one or two 3-week regimens) or vehicle. The results indicated that one succimer regimen was significantly superior to vehicle treatment in lowering lead levels in both blood and brain across the entire 8-week follow-up period. Similarly, a second succimer regimen offered significant additional benefit relative to one regimen for both blood and brain across the 4-week follow-up period. However, several findings revealed that succimer-induced reductions in brain lead lagged behind reductions in blood lead and were generally smaller in magnitude. Furthermore, a rebound was detected in blood, but not brain, lead levels after both succimer regimens. Given the results of this study, we urge caution in using blood lead as a surrogate for brain lead levels, particularly during and immediately after chelation treatment when reductions in blood lead levels overestimate reductions in brain lead levels. The present results suggest that, in clinical use, succimer treatment may need to extend beyond the point at which blood lead levels have dropped to an "acceptable" target value in order to effectively reduce brain lead levels and minimize neurotoxicity.

Indexed as

BrainModels, TheoreticalAnimalsBiomarkersChelating AgentsDisease Models, AnimalEndpoint DeterminationFemaleForecastingLeadLead PoisoningMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersChelating AgentsLeadSuccimer

Identifiers

PMID14998744
PMCPMC1241858
OpenAlexW1965758010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.