ReviewDer Internist2004
[Significance of aldosterone antagonist therapy].
Review in Der Internist, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Aldosterone excess or escape: Treating resistant hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the introduction of ACE-inhibitors into clinical practice, the diuretic treatment with the classical aldosterone antagonist spironolactone has disappeared. It was generally believed that chronic treatment with ACE-inhibitors significantly reduces aldosterone secretion via reduction of angiotensin II-dependent aldosterone formation. However, aldosterone "escape" occurs: Even during chronic treatment with ACE-inhibitors, plasma levels of aldosterone rise again, which is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, extrarenal actions of aldosterone have been demonstrated, which detrimentally affect coagulation, autonomic activity, inflammatory signalling, hemodynamics, and fibrosis, subsequently leading to cardiovascular damage. Recently published studies (RALES, EPHESUS) convincingly support the concept of detrimental cardiovascular aldosterone actions even during chronic ACE-inhibition. In addition to those cardiovascular effects, aldosterone antagonism has beneficial impacts on ascites, chronic renal disease, renal volume regulation, and hypokalemia induced by diuretics. Of note, aldosterone dependent mechanisms are believed to be even involved in essential hypertension, and the value of aldosterone antagonism is currently tested in those patients. In conclusion, an old-fashioned, previously abandoned treatment strategy is currently celebrating its revival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.