ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2004
[Surgical therapy of extracranial carotid stenosis].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Anesthesia for carotid artery surgery. Is there a gold standard?].Der Anaesthesist · 2008Review
- [Open therapy of carotid stenosis by endarterectomy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surgical therapy for severe stenosis of the carotid provides a highly effective prophylaxis for carotid dependent ischemic strokes. After carrying out prospective, randomised studies, evidence based indications for carotid thromboarterectomy are available. Here, it is necesary to take into account the degree of stenosis, an initial clinical symptom (amaurosis fugax, TIA, stroke), and postoperative risk. This can not exceed 3% by asymptomatic and 6% by symptomatic stenoses in order not to endanger the carotid thromboarterectomy. Stenting of carotid stenoses provides a possible alternative to surgery. Until the prospective, randomised studies are completed, carotid stenting offers a clinical possibility which can only be carried out through interdisciplinary cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.