Evidence map›Paper›PMID 14991165›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2004

[Use of beta blockers in cardiovascular diseases and bronchial asthma/COPD].

T Glaab, T Weiss

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T GlaabAbteilung für Pneumologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. thomasglaab@web.de
T Weiss

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous extensive, randomized clinical trials of beta-blockers have shown significant reduction of total mortality in patients with myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure. The life-saving therapy of myocardial infarction or chronic heart failure with beta-blockers, however, is often withheld from patients with COPD/asthma. Several studies demonstrate that especially patients with COPD would benefit from such a therapy due to their high cardiovascular risk profile. Recent meta-analyses show that cardioselective beta-blockers are well tolerated by these patients without causing relevant limitations in lung function. Present findings suggest that the mortality reduction of beta-blocker therapy may outweigh the risks in patients with COPD and possibly even in patients with mild asthma. Contraindications for beta-blockers include acute exacerbations and severe forms of COPD as well as moderate to severe asthma and the regular use of beta(2)-sympathomimetics. beta-Blocker therapy should be given with low initial doses on an individual basis after careful consideration of the benefit to risk ratio, preferably using cardioselective substances with proven mortality benefits for myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAsthmaBiological AvailabilityCardiovascular DiseasesChronic DiseaseContraindicationsHeart FailureHumansMetabolic Clearance RateMyocardial InfarctionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-Antagonists

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.